The Dot Tel domain: Once again, in the sandbox

.
The sandbox effect on Dot Tel domains, which is repetitive on Dot Tel domains, and which is real, is a real big problem for all holders / owners of such a .Tel domain.

The only hard service providers behind .Tel, are "NeuStar", and not so much Telnic, the Registry. That hard work, plus the hard work added from .Tel owners (populating quality content), gets partly destroyed by Google's ranking penalty, ever so often.

.Tel is the only Internet domain name, that gets regular penalty from Google.

Simple question: How can .Tel ever become a great success, if a .Tel, that users are looking for, is hidden in the sandbox?

Google's sandbox tactics are a 200% killer for all Dot Tel Domains.

A killer, because most users search for a .Tel within Google Search. I have been searching for .Tel domain names in Google, lately, and could not find any.

There is no such thing, as freedom within search and SEO.
Search, is either manipulated by domain owners, or by Google itself.

Google does not seem to care, but we .Tel owners, as well as the .Tel registry (a registry, that looks more like a joke, than a efficient and professional company) do care, indeed.
Because SEO matters.

This is the time to register and buy .Tel domains, because they will never be so cheap again...

It's because .Tel looks like a "non-go", but actually, it is only treated badly. However, if you take a close look at .Tel, you might be able to state, that this is a brilliant domain.

.


Quoted from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:


The Sandbox (a.k.a. Sandboxing or the sandbox effect or the Google penalty) is a name given to an observation about the way Google ranks web pages in its index. It is the subject of much debate—its existence has been written about[1][2] but not confirmed and several observers state that they have observed the contrary.[3]

According to the sandbox effect, Google temporarily reduces the page rank of new domains, placing them into what is referred to as its "sandbox", in an effort to counter the ways that search engine optimizers attempt to manipulate Google's page ranking by creating lots of inbound links to a new web site from other web sites that they own.

A "reverse sandbox" effect is also claimed to exist, whereby new pages with good content, but without inbound links, are temporarily increased in rank—much like the "New Releases" in a book store are displayed more prominently—to encourage organic building of the World Wide Web.[3][4]

David George disputes the claim that Google applies sandboxing to all new web sites, saying that the claim "doesn't seem to be borne out by experience". He states that he created a new web site in October 2004 and had it ranked in the top 20 Google results for a target keyword within one month. He avers that "[n]o one knows for sure if the Google sandbox exists", and comments that it "seems to fit the observations and experiments of many search engine optimizers". He theorizes that the sandbox "has introduced some hysteresis into the system in order to restore a bit of sanity to Google's results".[3]

In an interview with the Search Engine Roundtable website, Matt Cutts is reported to have said that there are some things in the algorithm that may be perceived as a sandbox that don't apply to all industries.[5] Jaimie Sirovich and Cristian Darie state that they believe that, while Google does not actually have an explicit "sandbox", the effect itself (however caused) is real.[4]